Ok, but anyway, as I said, I haven't a single one, and BTW, I'd rather have a more stable OS with 65000 bugs, then Win95/8 with 40000000000 bugs... + 1billion :) nt
This message was posted by mikael, posted on August 03, 2000 at 05:34:30 coming from 213.116.238 Mood of this message: This message is a reply to Win2K have a 63 000 know bugs in it(nt) posted from Fat_Mike posted at August 03, 2000 at 03:52:29
> > > 1. System doesn't hang up every ten minutes > > > 2. Internet Explorer doesn't terminate > > > if I have more then 5 windows opened. > > > 3. No one can access my computer anymore (except me of course :) (Great, cause I have a brother) > > > 4. 96% procent I use my computer to surf, 1 % to play Starcraft, 1% for Music, 1% for programs, Word and shit, and the final per cent is used for transferring games to my SWCDX2. So why would I need Win98 anymore? > > > 5. Win2k looks nicer and is more effective in Networks + I have more control over my computer then I had before. > > > 6. I will install Win98 only when I go to LANs, and I really need for gaming, otherwise, I want to keep Win2k, and that's why I need some transfer program that works under Win2k. > > > mikael
